• Rachel Maddow Calls 401k Plan a “Scam”

    Posted on by FFG | Leave a comment

    Watch as MSNBC host calls 401(k) plans a scam on her television show and breaks down the Wall Street lies and our crumbling retirement system. . .

     

  • Why I Don’t Invest In The Stock Market

    Posted on by FFG | Leave a comment

    This article appeared online at www.johncolanzi.com

    Why I Don’t Invest In The Stock Market
    by John Colanzi

    I’m tired of hearing everyone from the President on down telling me to invest in the stock market.

    If you want to help build America, invest in your business. This country was built by small business men and women.

    I don’t invest in the stock market because it’s out of my control. I don’t determine how the company is run or where their profits are placed.

    On top of all that, the returns are really peanuts compared to what you can earn from a well run business. When the market dropped they said investors shouldn’t worry they should have their money back in 5 years.

    Guess what?

    If I invest in a good program, I usually make back my investment plus within 5 minutes. Can the stock market do that?

    I’ve invested in programs for $10 or $20 and made back 10 times that within 24 hours. I couldn’t even cover the brokerage fees for the cost of starting a business online.

    Take control of your future. Take responsibility for your success. You are the future.

    Learn how to market on the internet and you’ll never worry whether the economy is up or down. You’re the boss. Your ability will determine your future.

    Why are so many people more willing to invest in the markets and not in themselves?

    They don’t believe in themselves. They think big business will make the money for them.

    I’m going to tell you something that I hope you take to heart. I know you can succeed. I know you can outperform the stock market.

    I believe in you. Probably more than you believe in yourself.

    Don’t invest in the stock market. Invest in YOU INC.

    In the words of Ben Franklin “Keep Thy Shop and Thy Shop will Keep Thee.”

    Take off your blinders and realize, you were born to succeed. Invest in you.

    Wishing You Success,
    John

    http://johncolanzi.com

    This entry was posted in Uncategorized.
  • Welcome

    Posted on by FFG | 1 Comment

    Welcome to the FFG website! If you are looking for a blend of personal service and expertise, you have come to the right place.  FFG is dedicated to providing  “no-hassle” nontraditional financial advice and service to individuals, families and small businesses.  We believe your financial success is rooted in education not manipulation. Thank you for taking time to visit our website.

    Brian J. Fischer, President

    Fischer Financial Group

    This entry was posted in Uncategorized.
  • Mutual Fund Fees

    Posted on by FFG | Leave a comment

    I have not written at length about the mutual fund scandal as of yet but this press release from 2009 I happened to come across and thought I would offer quick remarks. Having followed mutual funds for many years, I have come to the conclusion that most (not all) are simply a part of the scam I coin as “Wall Street Greed.” The media entices people to invest in mutual funds saying they are great vehicles because they offer professional management, built in diversification and convenience.

    The dark side of some mutual funds is what takes place behind the scenes: market timing, excessive fees and poor performance (relative to benchmark stock indices), shelf space payments – all the stuff you have absolutely no clue about. When all the smoke clears it becomes pretty apparent of what Wall Street’s motive is…to keep your money as long as possible. Why? Because Wall Street makes its money by managing your money…plain and simple.

    So when a company like Putnam got exposed during the mutual fund scandal (which continues to this day) for its role in hurting its shareholders with its illegal practices they have to find away to “reinvent themselves” after investors in their funds left in droves. Thus it peaked my interest when I came across this press release in the Boston Globe:

    Putnam fund fees will drop or be linked to performance

    By Todd Wallack, Globe Staff | July 29, 2009

    Putnam Investments, which has drawn complaints from some investors for charging high fees while delivering sub-par returns over the past decade, announced plans yesterday to dramatically overhaul its fee structure.

    The Boston money manager said it plans to lower the management fees for many of its fixed income funds on Aug. 1, to make them more price-competitive. And it plans to tie fees for many of its other funds to performance, so Putnam will only be paid a premium if it delivers strong results and will be paid less if it stumbles badly.

    “This puts us on the same side of the table as the shareholder,’’ said Putnam chief executive Robert Reynolds.

    Among the more dramatic examples, the Putnam American Government Income Fund’s management fee will be reduced from 0.62 percent of the money invested to 0.41 percent a year. The average fee reduction for bond funds would be 13 percent, and 10 percent for asset allocation funds. Putnam has $102.8 billion in assets under management.

    The new price structure is just the latest in a series of changes introduced by Reynolds, a longtime Fidelity Investments executive, who took over Putnam a year ago. Over the past 13 months, Reynolds has added products, recruited dozens of investment professionals, and changed the way Putnam manages its funds.

    Where they sorely lagged in previous years, Putnam funds generally have performed better than average so far this year, according to Morningstar, a Chicago research firm that tracks mutual funds.

    Morningstar analyst Jonathan Rahbar praised the fee reduction as “shareholder friendly’’ and said it could help Putnam in its battle to attract investors.

    “It’s something that opens another door for them’’ Rahbar said. “But performance and consistency will be the main factors behind whether investors go back to Putnam.’’

    Avi Nachmany, executive vice president of Strategic Insight, another research firm that tracks mutual funds, said Putnam management fees are currently about average for mutual funds. But Nachmany said the changes are another example of how Putnam has become “very innovative and forward looking’’ under Reynolds.

    Reynolds said the management fees for its stock funds are already among the lowest in the industry and he wanted fees on Putnam’s fixed income funds to be as well; currently, he said, the fees on fixed income funds are about average.

    Fees on mutual funds have been getting a bad rap lately as seen by the number of lawsuits filed and congressional involvement. So let’s get this right…Putnam is enticing investors back to their funds by promising to lower fees that are already too high and if they beat performance expectations (not defined in release) they get MORE money but if they don’t they get less money. This sounds like a WIN-WIN for Putnam. Any way you slice it Putnam makes money…its just a matter of how much. Now the underlying danger lies in how rich risk Putnam will take with its funds in an effort to “beat performance expectations.”

    If Putnam truly wants to be “on the same side of the table with investors” how about Putnam saying they make money ONLY if their shareholders make money. That’s true innovation!

  • 15 Reasons Why Your 401(k) May Be Your Riskiest Investment

    Posted on by FFG | Leave a comment

    15 Reasons Why Your 401(k) May Be Your Riskiest Investment

    By Garrett Gunderson, Author Killing Sacred Cows

    Financial institutions are genius marketers. They are able to get millions of Americans to hand over their money with very little thought taken, very little knowledge of the so-called investments offered, and even less control of their investments.

    When the evidence is plainly presented, it becomes overwhelmingly clear that putting money into 401(k)s and similar qualified plans is not investing at all — it is one of the riskiest gambles for most individuals. Read the following reasons why I say this, and ask yourself if it’s time to reconsider your 401(k).

    1. Limited Opportunity For Cash Flow

    Qualified retirement plans, such as 401(k)s and IRAs, do not provide immediate cash flow, which means that you cannot benefit from them through velocity and utilization. The theory is that letting the money sit allows it to compound, but for most people this really means that it stagnates.

    Most people will not choose to utilize these funds even when a particularly compelling opportunity arises that will make them far more than the 401(k) would, even accounting for the penalties. This means that numerous legitimate opportunities are passed by as people stay “in it for the long haul.”

    2. Lack of Liquidity

    The money is tied up with penalties attached for early withdrawal. Although there are a few technicalities that allow penalty-free withdrawals, the restrictions are so numerous that very few know how to get around them.

    3. Market Dependency

    The performance of the funds is dependent upon market factors that most individuals do not have the knowledge nor the ability to understand or mitigate.

    This means that your retirement plans are based on unknowable projections, making for a dangerous and uncertain planning environment. Uncertainty causes fear, and fear leads to mistakes, worry, scarcity, and ultimately lost hopes and dreams. Do you want to live your ideal life only if the market cooperates?

    4. The Match Myth

    “Take the match — it’s a guaranteed 100 percent return before you even get started in the market!” You’ve heard that before, right?

    The problem is that it’s a complete myth — were it true most 401(k) savers could end up with literally billions of dollars at retirement. What is the true impact on the bottom line to you? When do you utilize the match?

    5. Lack of Knowledge

    How much do you really know about your 401(k)? Do you know what happens to the money? Do you know what funds you’re invested in? Do you know the companies that your funds are invested in? Have you seen financials for these companies and do you know their key executives?

    Do you know the fund manager by name, her history, her investment philosophy, her performance? How can you expect to gain a return from something you know so little about? How can you create real, tangible value in the world in the 401(k) scenario?

    And how can this be called investing? Without full knowledge of an investment, placing money amounts to little more than gambling, which is the desire to get something for nothing. The “something-for-nothing” attitude – no matter now subconscious – is exceedingly destructive.

    6. Administrative Fees

    The funds are subject to various administrative fees in addition to expense ratios and 12-b1 fees (for marketing expenses). This is a fact which most people and even many advisors ignore. This means that your returns will be negatively impacted and your projections can be substantially off.

    7. Under-Utilization Because of Tax Deferral

    If you don’t like paying taxes today, why would you want to pay them any more in the future? In other words, the tax deferral aspect, which is touted as a great boon, is actually a primary factor contributing to qualified plan money being notoriously under-utilized.

    Most retirees let the money sit, even during their retirement years, for fear of triggering tax consequences. If you just have to pay the taxes as a later date how is it a tax advantage? The reason there is no tax paid is because you have deferred income by never taking constructive receipt of your earning and instead deferring them into a qualified plan.

    8. Higher Tax Brackets Upon Withdrawal

    Closely related to the previous problem, the other issue with taxes is that most advice fails to take into consideration the likelihood of you being in a higher tax bracket during your retirement years than you were previously.

    Think about it: If you have achieved any measure of success living the accumulation theory, you should actually be in a higher tax bracket at retirement, although most advisors project that you will be in a lower tax bracket.

    So this means that deferring your taxes results in a far greater tax burden than would otherwise be incurred using different products and strategies than the conventional route. It’s profound irony that people project healthy returns on their qualified plan while also projecting that they will be in a lower tax bracket at retirement.

    9. Estate Taxes

    401(k)s are sitting ducks for estate taxes. Much qualified plan money is never utilized by those who actually accumulated it because they hold off so long on withdrawing it in fear of paying taxes.

    Yet when the money is passed on to the next generation, there is not only an income tax that can be triggered, it may be subject to an estate tax that there is no internal provision to avoid either. So when the money is passed to the next generation, the government taking a healthy chunk before it passes hands. This begs the question of who is the real beneficiary of the program.

    10. No Exit Strategy

    Getting into a 401(k) seems simple enough. In fact, many companies start employees’ 401(k) contributions automatically upon hiring them. They sound great – you’re getting a match, tax deferral, a wide choice of funds relating to your risk tolerance.

    But how are you going to get out of it? How many people take this into consideration when they start contributions? How many people understand the penalty and tax consequences? Most people don’t fully realize the implications until it’s too late, and so their qualified plan money sits unutilized.

    In that case, what is the real rate of return of your money? Once again, in that scenario, who are the real beneficiaries? Not them, and not their heirs to a large extent – it’s the institutions and the government.

    11. Subject to Government Control and Change

    Did you know your 401(k) does not even technically belong to you? Read the fine print and you will find that it is what’s called an “FBO” (For Benefit Of). In other words, it’s technically owned by the government, but provided for your benefit. It’s essentially a tax code.

    If history proves to be a reliable guide, 401(k) funds are therefore in great jeopardy. In the same way that the government raises and lowers taxes at their whim, what is to keep them from changing the rules and taking the money that you so diligently saved?

    12. Golden Handcuffs

    Are you at your current job because it aligns with your passions and purpose, or because of the great benefits? Are you just holding on long enough until your qualified plan funds are fully vested? Are there ways that you could create more wealth and opportunity by living your Soul Purpose, rather than being attached to the deceptive security of a 401(k)?

    13. Disinvesting

    Suppose you’ve retired and want to begin taking interest payments from your qualified plan. You project that you can withdraw 6 percent a year, based on an average return of 8 percent a year. However, what happens to your principal when the funds are volatile and the market experiences down years?

    Your funds may be receiving an average 8 percent annually, but that means that some years will be lower, some will be higher. If in one year your fund is down 10 percent, you’re tapping into your principal to take your interest withdrawal. At that point, you have only two choices: 1) start withdrawing principal, or 2) leave the money alone until your funds are up again.

    14. No Holistic Plan

    I’ve witnessed on many occasions people whose finances are in shambles and although they have much more pressing needs, they diligently contribute to their 401(k). They’ve been convinced to do so, of course, because of the match, tax deferral, etc. It’s like a person trying to take care of a scraped knee when their wrist is slit.

    What they really need is a macroeconomic approach to their finances that will help them identify, prioritize, and manage all pieces of their financial puzzle, with all pieces coordinated and working together.

    15. Neglect of Stewardship

    Ultimately, the most destructive aspect of 401(k)s is that they cause many individuals to abdicate their responsibility, abandon self-reliance, and neglect their stewardship over their own prosperity.

    People think that if they just throw enough money at the “experts” that somehow, some way, and without their direct involvement they will end up thirty years later with a lot of money. And when things don’t turn out that way they think they can blame others – despite the fact that they only have themselves to blame.

    Conclusion

    Qualified plans are promoted on such a wide scale because those promoting it have vested interests – and their interests don’t necessarily coincide with yours.

    If you currently contribute to a 401(k), stop and think about it for a minute. What is it really doing for you, now and in the future?

    The desire to save money for retirement is wise and prudent, but after reading the above, do you think it’s possible to find other investment philosophies, products, and strategies that would meet your financial objectives much more quickly and safely than a qualified plan? Are you really comfortable exposing yourself to this much risk?

    How can you mitigate your risk, increase your returns, and create safe and sustainable investments? How can you create more control and better exit strategies, reduce your tax burden, and increase your cash flow?

    Your financial future depends on your answers to these questions.

  • America Is ‘Not’ Broke

    Posted on by FFG | Leave a comment

    The following is a transcript and video of a speech Michael Moore gave to workers in Wisconsin…definitely eye opening

    America is not broke.

    By Michael Moore – 3.5.2011

    Contrary to what those in power would like you to believe so that you’ll give up your pension, cut your wages, and settle for the life your great-grandparents had, America is not broke. Not by a long shot. The country is awash in wealth and cash. It’s just that it’s not in your hands. It has been transferred, in the greatest heist in history, from the workers and consumers to the banks and the portfolios of the uber-rich.

    Today just 400 Americans have as much wealth as the bottom half of all Americans combined.

    Let me say that again. 400 obscenely rich people, most of whom benefited in some way from the multi-trillion dollar taxpayer “bailout” of 2008, now have as much loot, stock and property as the assets of 155 million Americans combined. If you can’t bring yourself to call that a financial coup d’état, then you are simply not being honest about what you know in your heart to be true.

    And I can see why. For us to admit that we have let a small group of men abscond with and hoard the bulk of the wealth that runs our economy, would mean that we’d have to accept the humiliating acknowledgment that we have indeed surrendered our precious Democracy to the moneyed elite. Wall Street, the banks and the Fortune 500 now run this Republic — and, until this past month, the rest of us have felt completely helpless, unable to find a way to do anything about it.

    [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgNuSEZ8CDw]

    I have nothing more than a high school degree. But back when I was in school, every student had to take one semester of economics in order to graduate. And here’s what I learned: Money doesn’t grow on trees. It grows when we make things. It grows when we have good jobs with good wages that we use to buy the things we need and thus create more jobs. It grows when we provide an outstanding educational system that then grows a new generation of inventers, entrepreneurs, artists, scientists and thinkers who come up with the next great idea for the planet. And that new idea creates new jobs and that creates revenue for the state. But if those who have the most money don’t pay their fair share of taxes, the state can’t function. The schools can’t produce the best and the brightest who will go on to create those jobs. If the wealthy get to keep most of their money, we have seen what they will do with it: recklessly gamble it on crazy Wall Street schemes and crash our economy. The crash they created cost us millions of jobs. That too caused a reduction in revenue. And the population ended up suffering because they reduced their taxes, reduced our jobs and took wealth out of the system, removing it from circulation.

    The nation is not broke, my friends. Wisconsin is not broke. It’s part of the Big Lie. It’s one of the three biggest lies of the decade: America/Wisconsin is broke, Iraq has WMD, the Packers can’t win the Super Bowl without Brett Favre.

    The truth is, there’s lots of money to go around. LOTS. It’s just that those in charge have diverted that wealth into a deep well that sits on their well-guarded estates. They know they have committed crimes to make this happen and they know that someday you may want to see some of that money that used to be yours. So they have bought and paid for hundreds of politicians across the country to do their bidding for them. But just in case that doesn’t work, they’ve got their gated communities, and the luxury jet is always fully fueled, the engines running, waiting for that day they hope never comes. To help prevent that day when the people demand their country back, the wealthy have done two very smart things:

    1. They control the message. By owning most of the media they have expertly convinced many Americans of few means to buy their version of the American Dream and to vote for their politicians. Their version of the Dream says that you, too, might be rich some day – this is America, where anything can happen if you just apply yourself! They have conveniently provided you with believable examples to show you how a poor boy can become a rich man, how the child of a single mother in Hawaii can become president, how a guy with a high school education can become a successful filmmaker. They will play these stories for you over and over again all day long so that the last thing you will want to do is upset the apple cart — because you — yes, you, too! — might be rich/president/an Oscar-winner some day! The message is clear: keep you head down, your nose to the grindstone, don’t rock the boat and be sure to vote for the party that protects the rich man that you might be some day.

    2. They have created a poison pill that they know you will never want to take. It is their version of mutually assured destruction. And when they threatened to release this weapon of mass economic annihilation in September of 2008, we blinked. As the economy and the stock market went into a tailspin, and the banks were caught conducting a worldwide Ponzi scheme, Wall Street issued this threat: Either hand over trillions of dollars from the American taxpayers or we will crash this economy straight into the ground. Fork it over or it’s Goodbye savings accounts. Goodbye pensions. Goodbye United States Treasury. Goodbye jobs and homes and future. It was friggin’ awesome and it scared the shit out of everyone. “Here! Take our money! We don’t care. We’ll even print more for you! Just take it! But, please, leave our lives alone, PLEASE!”

    The executives in the board rooms and hedge funds could not contain their laughter, their glee, and within three months they were writing each other huge bonus checks and marveling at how perfectly they had played a nation full of suckers. Millions lost their jobs anyway, and millions lost their homes. But there was no revolt (see #1).

    Until now. On Wisconsin! Never has a Michigander been more happy to share a big, great lake with you! You have aroused the sleeping giant know as the working people of the United States of America. Right now the earth is shaking and the ground is shifting under the feet of those who are in charge. Your message has inspired people in all 50 states and that message is: WE HAVE HAD IT! We reject anyone tells us America is broke and broken. It’s just the opposite! We are rich with talent and ideas and hard work and, yes, love. Love and compassion toward those who have, through no fault of their own, ended up as the least among us. But they still crave what we all crave: Our country back! Our democracy back! Our good name back! The United States of America. NOT the Corporate States of America. The United States of America!

    So how do we get this? Well, we do it with a little bit of Egypt here, a little bit of Madison there. And let us pause for a moment and remember that it was a poor man with a fruit stand in Tunisia who gave his life so that the world might focus its attention on how a government run by billionaires for billionaires is an affront to freedom and morality and humanity.

    Thank you, Wisconsin. You have made people realize this was our last best chance to grab the final thread of what was left of who we are as Americans. For three weeks you have stood in the cold, slept on the floor, skipped out of town to Illinois — whatever it took, you have done it, and one thing is for certain: Madison is only the beginning. The smug rich have overplayed their hand. They couldn’t have just been content with the money they raided from the treasury. They couldn’t be satiated by simply removing millions of jobs and shipping them overseas to exploit the poor elsewhere. No, they had to have more – something more than all the riches in the world. They had to have our soul. They had to strip us of our dignity. They had to shut us up and shut us down so that we could not even sit at a table with them and bargain about simple things like classroom size or bulletproof vests for everyone on the police force or letting a pilot just get a few extra hours sleep so he or she can do their job — their $19,000 a year job. That’s how much some rookie pilots on commuter airlines make, maybe even the rookie pilots flying people here to Madison. But he’s stopped trying to get better pay. All he asks is that he doesn’t have to sleep in his car between shifts at O’Hare airport. That’s how despicably low we have sunk. The wealthy couldn’t be content with just paying this man $19,000 a year. They wanted to take away his sleep. They wanted to demean and dehumanize him. After all, he’s just another slob.

    And that, my friends, is Corporate America’s fatal mistake. But trying to destroy us they have given birth to a movement — a movement that is becoming a massive, nonviolent revolt across the country. We all knew there had to be a breaking point some day, and that point is upon us. Many people in the media don’t understand this. They say they were caught off guard about Egypt, never saw it coming. Now they act surprised and flummoxed about why so many hundreds of thousands have come to Madison over the last three weeks during brutal winter weather. “Why are they all standing out there in the cold? I mean there was that election in November and that was supposed to be that!

    “There’s something happening here, and you don’t know what it is, do you …?”

    America ain’t broke! The only thing that’s broke is the moral compass of the rulers. And we aim to fix that compass and steer the ship ourselves from now on. Never forget, as long as that Constitution of ours still stands, it’s one person, one vote, and it’s the thing the rich hate most about America — because even though they seem to hold all the money and all the cards, they begrudgingly know this one unshakable basic fact: There are more of us than there are of them!

    Madison, do not retreat. We are with you. We will win together.

  • Wall Street’s New Lie To Main Street…Asset Allocation

    Posted on by FFG | Leave a comment

    Great blog from Mark Cuban (owner of the Dallas Mavericks)www.blogmaverick.com

    The greatest lie ever told used to be Wall Street telling main street to “buy and hold”. Of course that’s what they told you every chance they got. It’s not what they did. The holding period for stocks dropped from 8 years in 1960s to 2 years in the 1990s and 8 months in the 2000s. Today, stocks are bought and sold in milliseconds. Which is one of the big reasons you don’t hear much about buy and hold any more. That and the fact it didn’t work. I think individual owners of stocks finally came to understand that old saying “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me for 50 years, shame on me. “
    But Wall Street needs a marketing slogan doesn’t it ? How else are they going to get all the suckers back into the market? (Great article on the Stock market is for Suckers from www.Macleans.ca). So what’s the new mantra that all those brokers, mutual funds and ETFs want you to buy in to ?

    Asset Allocation (Aka diversification) is the best approach to investing. Everyone is talking about asset allocation. It’s not a surprise given all the new funds, REITs and ETFs that have popped up in the last couple years. The more diversification sold to individuals, the more money to buy them all. Wall Street has to sell what it has doesn’t it ? It’s just good business for them. But not for you.

    No longer does Wall Street even want you to consider buying what you know. Remember Peter Lynch describing how buyers of stocks should pay attention to what they see in the mall and elsewhere and use that as a source of ideas and information ? Or Warren Buffet suggesting that we should actually invest in things we know and look for the value there ? Well you can forget about that kind of investing.

    Today, your investment advisors want you invest in things you have absolutely no fricking clue about and have pretty much absolutely no fricking ability to learn about.

    They want you to diversify into Emerging Markets, Commodities, International Bonds, Munis, Real Estate Investment Trusts, ….and.. well, a lot of different “stuff”. Here is an excerpt from an article from a Sarasota paper today:

    “For context, I will provide the performance of my “moderate investor’s asset allocation” for both 2010 and with its predecessors for the period since 2000. For the previous 10 years, its predecessors were up about a cumulative 104 percent.

    Last year’s version of the allocation was:
    Fifteen percent in an S&P 500 index fund (IVV).
    Five percent in a small-capitalization value fund (VBR).
    Twenty percent in a diversified international stock fund (VEU).
    Five percent in an emerging markets international fund (VWO).
    Five percent in Real Estate Investment Trusts (VNQ).
    Ten percent in large and mid-capitalization stocks with a history of paying competitive and increasing dividends (VIG).
    Ten percent in a diversified portfolio of convertible securities (ACHIX).
    Five percent in a U.S. Treasury inflation-indexed bonds and notes (VIPSX).
    Fifteen percent in an international bond fund with traditional fixed coupon bonds (GIM).
    Five percent in an international bond fund for inflation-indexed bonds (WIP).
    Five percent in cash equivalents.”

    That is a suggestion for a “moderate investor” . Let me translate this all for you. “I want you to invest 5 percent in cash and the rest in 10 different funds about which you know absolutely nothing. I want you to make this investment knowing that even if there were 128 hours in a day and you had a year long vacation, you could not possibly begin to understand all of these products. In fact, I don’t understand them either, but because I know it sounds good and everyone is making the same kind of recommendations, we all can pretend we are smart and going to make a lot of money. Until we don’t.“

    Asset allocation is about making you a sucker. Do you seriously want to put a significant percentage of the money you will need for your future in funds that put your money into things you have absolutely no idea about? Will you have any clue about when to change your asset allocation? Will you change it based on changes in the dollar ? Changes in domestic inflation ? Changes in European inflation ? Inflation in China ? Changes in tax laws in Italy and Greece ? Changes in interest rates ? Trade balances ?

    It comes down to this. Do you want to invest in something you know, or in something Wall Street wants you to believe?

    Do you really think your broker, his boss and the analysts at their firm really are being completely honest with you about how much they know about these investments they want you to make ? Ask them if they are making the exact same investment with their money. Ask them if they would make the same investment if they were not allowed to look at a quote screen all day long like you aren’t able to – which tells you if they trust the investment or want to watch it second by second knowing they may have to pull the trigger and get out on a moments notice.

    Ask your broker for the names of people they have had to call or get a call from and let them know that their investment has been wiped out. Talk to those people to understand what the ramifications of making in an investment in something you know nothing about might be.

    Don’t be a sucker. Remember this. It’s better to make less, or next to nothing than to lose everything. Don’t get greedy. Don’t get desperate. The stock market can’t save your financial future, but it can end it.

  • Even Rich People Need Insurance

    Posted on by FFG | Leave a comment

    This article originally appeared on Yahoo Finance.

    Ultrarich Families Often Poorly Insured
    By Thomas Coyle
    Wednesday, January 5, 2011

    Like most people, the ultrawealthy don’t like to dwell on what can go wrong. As a result, many of them have spotty insurance coverage, and their financial advisers often lack the expertise to fix the problem.

    “Insurance is less exciting than investments and it requires thinking about bad outcomes, so it’s not the first thing people want to engage,” says Rebecca Meyer, head of client strategy at Pitcairn, a Philadelphia-area multifamily office that advises about 100 families on approximately $3.4 billion.

    Now though, spurred by losses and uncertainty associated with the downturn, some families are taking more systematic approaches to insurance.

    Most ultrahigh-net-worth families — those with, say, $30 million or more in liquid assets — have property and casualty, health and life coverage. But they’re apt, for lack of oversight, to leave gaps or let policies lapse, especially when it comes to excess liability.

    This neglect can be costly. Jonathan Crystal of the insurance brokerage Frank Crystal & Company tells of a chief executive who had to liquidate his family partnership — an expensive way to raise money — to fund a settlement stemming from a son’s car accident.

    “That happened because the son didn’t want to pay for the coverage, and it could have been avoided if the family had paid a couple of thousand of dollars for liability insurance,” says Crystal.

    Another wealthy family paid dearly after a house guest sustained permanent injury in a swimming accident, Crystal recalled. They had household liability coverage all right; it just didn’t extend to their pool.

    Though theft and property damage rank high on the list of insurable risks that preoccupy the wealthy, getting sued — personally or through a business — is their biggest nightmare. And the fear is well founded. Crystal and Meyer agree that the rich are more likely to be sued than lower-net-worth people.

    The way to set rich minds at ease is to follow a four-point approach to managing risk through insurance, according to “Insurance Matters,” a new report for family offices — wealth-management entities maintained by families with hundreds of millions of dollars — by Frank Crystal & Company and the Family Office Exchange.

    Family offices should begin by pinpointing and covering the insurable risks each family member faces, and make sure this coverage remains active and adequate over time. Bringing in outside experts to assess and manage less readily insurable risks, like identity theft and threats to personal security, is important.

    The second point is to use the family’s purchasing power and scale to secure better terms for individual households and family members. Right now, fewer than half the 120 or so family offices polled for “Insurance Matters” take this approach.

    The report also recommends managing the risk posed by wayward or ill-starred dependents, mainly by educating them about insurance and risk management as part of their overall engagement with the family’s wealth and long-term legacy. Though it’s tempting to dismiss this point as a “soft issue,” the fact remains that parents are liable for damage done by a dependent child — however disaffected or independent the youngster may feel.

    Finally, “Insurance Matters” urges family offices to stop relegating insurance brokers to support roles and start engaging them as primary advisers on par with financial planners, asset managers, accountants and attorneys. But it doesn’t suggest wealthy families put brokers directly on the payroll.

    “Given the breadth of a typical family office’s services, the complexity of insurance, time and resource constraints, most family offices should not attempt to develop internal insurance expertise,” the report says.

  • What Is A Living Will?

    Posted on by FFG | Leave a comment

    “Living will” is a term commonly used to refer to a legal document available in most states that allows an adult to state in advance whether or not life-sustaining medical procedures should be used to prolong life when there is no chance for a reasonable recovery.
    Why Should You Consider a Living Will?

    Reasons to consider a living will include:

    * A belief that adults have the right to control medical decisions regarding their care, including the right to refuse or withdraw life-sustaining treatment.

    * Concern about the suffering and loss of dignity that can occur when life-sustaining measures are used to prolong an inevitable death.

    * Easing the emotional pain the family might otherwise have to suffer in making such a difficult decision.

    * Relieving a doctor’s and hospital’s fears of liability in withholding or withdrawing treatment.

    * Language concerning organ donation can be included in a living will.

    How Do You Implement a Living Will?

    While the validity of a living will is determined by state statute, the requirements generally include that the document be (1) in writing, (2) dated, (3) signed and (4) witnessed by two people who are not related to the declarant and are not heirs of his or her estate. In addition, doctors and their employees, as well as hospital employees, are generally not acceptable witnesses. Consult your doctor or attorney for more information about the availability of a living will in your state.

    Once a living will has been executed, copies should be given to close family members, the primary doctor and the family attorney.

    A living will can be revoked at any time by destroying the document and any copies or by signing a notarized revocation of the document.

    This entry was posted in estate planning and tagged , , , , , .
  • So What’s In The New Tax Law?

    Posted on by FFG | Leave a comment

    The House and Senate have voted, and President Obama has signed the new Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 (Tax Relief Act of 2010). The new law includes a number of tax breaks for many taxpayers. Here are some highlights to discuss with your tax professional or attorney:

    Current tax rates and certain tax breaks extended for two years

    The Tax Relief Act extends the tax rates of 10%, 15%, 25%, 28%, 33%, and 35% for another two years.
    The new law extends for two years the repeal of the phaseout of personal exemption for certain high-income taxpayers.
    The new law also extends for two years the repeal of the limitation on itemized deductions for certain high-income taxpayers.

    Capital gains and dividends

    The Tax Relief Act sets capital gains and qualified dividends tax rates at 0% and 15% for another two years.

    AMT patch

    The new law increases the AMT exemption amounts for two years.

    Estate tax

    The Tax Relief Act sets the estate tax exemption at $5 million per person and $10 million per couple for estates of decedents dying in 2011 and 2012.
    The new law reunifies gift and estate taxes. The gift tax exemption increases to $5 million per person for gifts made in 2011 and 2012.
    The new law also caps the tax rate at 35% for estates, gifts, and generation-skipping transfers.
    The new law provides a choice for estates of decedents who died in 2010 to use the new estate tax exemptions/rates with a stepped-up basis rule, OR to use the existing 2010 law with no federal estate tax but a limit in the amount of basis step-up that is allowed.
    The new law allows for “portability” of the estate tax exemption, meaning that any unused estate tax exemption of a deceased spouse can be carried over and utilized by the other spouse who dies second.


    Other points of interest:

    The employee withholding portion of the Social Security payroll tax will be reduced by 2.0% for 2011 (e.g., 6.2% withholding is reduced to 4.2%).
    Extends for 2010 and 2011 the ability of taxpayers age 70½ or older to exclude from gross income up to $100,000 of qualified charitable distributions.
    Extension of unemployment insurance benefits for 13 months.

    This entry was posted in Uncategorized.